MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023895270

PERANCANGAN KOMUNIKASI VISUAL MEDIA EDUKASI ANAK USIA 3-5 TAHUN SEBAGAI PENCEGAHAN DAMPAK PENGGUNAAN GADGET TAK TERKENDALI

2021· dissertation· id· W7023895270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUnika Repositor (Unika) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGadgetPrint mediaMedia use
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penggunaan gadget yang berlebihan pada anak berusia 3-5 tahun sangatlah berbahaya. Karena kurangnya peran orang tua dalam mendampingi anak saat bermain gadget membuat anak menjadi lebih mudah untuk kecanduan. Hal ini membuat perkembangan anak usia 3-5 tahun menjadi terhambat. Berdasarkan Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) dan Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) merekomendasikan limitasi screen time untuk anak usia 3-5 tahun yaitu hanya sebanyak 1 jam per hari dan maksimum 2 jam per hari. Hal ini dikarenakan anak-anak harus menyediakan waktu lebih untuk bersosialisasi dengan teman dan orang tua mereka secara langsung.
\nOleh karena itu, melalui perancangan ini, penulis bertujuan untuk membuat perancangan yang dapat mengedukasi orangtua akan pentingnya screen time pada anak dan pentingnya peran orangtua dalam tumbuh kembang anak usia 3-5 tahun

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it