PERANCANGAN KOMUNIKASI VISUAL MEDIA EDUKASI ANAK USIA 3-5 TAHUN SEBAGAI PENCEGAHAN DAMPAK PENGGUNAAN GADGET TAK TERKENDALI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penggunaan gadget yang berlebihan pada anak berusia 3-5 tahun sangatlah berbahaya. Karena kurangnya peran orang tua dalam mendampingi anak saat bermain gadget membuat anak menjadi lebih mudah untuk kecanduan. Hal ini membuat perkembangan anak usia 3-5 tahun menjadi terhambat. Berdasarkan Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) dan Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) merekomendasikan limitasi screen time untuk anak usia 3-5 tahun yaitu hanya sebanyak 1 jam per hari dan maksimum 2 jam per hari. Hal ini dikarenakan anak-anak harus menyediakan waktu lebih untuk bersosialisasi dengan teman dan orang tua mereka secara langsung. \nOleh karena itu, melalui perancangan ini, penulis bertujuan untuk membuat perancangan yang dapat mengedukasi orangtua akan pentingnya screen time pada anak dan pentingnya peran orangtua dalam tumbuh kembang anak usia 3-5 tahun
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.234 | 0.077 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".