MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023955939

Programa de comercialización de Hongos (Suillus luteus) comestibles para mejorar las condiciones de vida en Marayhuaca – Incahuasi – Ferreñafe – Lambayeque.

2019· dissertation· es· W7023955939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Qualitative analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente proyecto de investigación ha sido elaborado con la finalidad de diseñar un
\nPrograma de comercialización de hongo comestible, de tal manera que contribuya a
\nmejorar las condiciones de vida de los agricultores de la comunidad campesina San
\nIsidro Labrador de Marayhuaca del distrito de Incahuasi. El hongo comestible es un
\nproducto con gran potencial comercial pudiendo ser adquiridos en diversas
\npresentaciones; sumado a esto posee grandes propiedades nutricionales y medicinales.
\nEl hongo comestible de Marayhuaca es considerado una carne 100% vegetal y
\necológica, ideal para ser incluida en una dieta diaria sana para personas de toda edad. La
\ncomunidad campesina de Marayhuaca cuenta con óptimas condiciones climáticas y
\ngeográficas para la producción del hongo Suillus Luteus, pero carecen de una
\ninfraestructura adecuada para su deshidratación y empaquetado, además los agricultores
\nde la comunidad campesina tienen dificultades para comercializar su producto debido a
\nla falta de conocimiento en ésta área. En la presente investigación se elaboró un manual
\nde comercialización de hongo comestibles que sirva como guía para aquellos
\nagricultores de la comunidad que desean comercializar su producto de manera más
\neficaz y competitiva y de ésta manera poder contribuir en la mejora de sus condiciones
\nde vida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207