MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023975417

Program planning and evaluation framework for a community based food project in Mwanza, Tanzania / by Ellena Andoniou.

2017· other· en· W7023975417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationGovernment (linguistics)PovertyFood securityWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ravaging effects of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa are well known.
\nCountries in the region are facing a crisis of unprecedented proportions further compounded by
\npoverty, malnutrition and social inequalities. This is especially true in Tanzania, one of the
\nworld?s poorest countries - where the majority of the population lives in absolute poverty; there
\nis a disproportionately high level of food insecurity and poor nutritional standards are extensive.
\nInitiated in 2003, The University of Western Ontario (UWO) in partnership with the National
\nInstitute for Medical Research (NIMR), the Kivulini Women?s Rights Organization (KWRO)
\nand a local women?s group, the Tukwamuane, launched a probiotic food based community
\nproject in Mwanza, Tanzania - a high-need area as defined by the Canadian International
\nDevelopment Agency. The Western Heads East (WHE) probiotic yoghurt project is an
\ninternational collaboration fostering community health and development. The project is a microenterprise
\ninitiative which aims to improve health and nutrition, while alleviating suffering from
\nmalnutrition, diarrhoeal diseases, and urogenital disorders in vulnerable social groups in the
\ncontext of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Women with little or no formal education are trained to
\nproduce probiotic yoghurt for sale and subsidized distribution to People Living with HIV/AIDS
\n(PLWHAs) at the community level. The project has the potential to foster health improvement,
\nas well as empowerment, advocacy skills among women and promote knowledge transfer to
\nfuture generations.
\nHowever, at the inception of WHE, the necessary steps to develop key planning and
\nevaluation frameworks were not taken. As such, the purpose of this project is to prepare a
\nprogram planning and evaluation framework which will enable project planners, stakeholders,
\nand researchers to evaluate project outcomes, the health impacts and improvements in quality of
\nlife for the women making the yoghurt, their families and the broader community; as well as to
\nexplore women?s perceptions (if any) of empowerment, and how the project is enabling them to
\nachieve their everyday life objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207