Program planning and evaluation framework for a community based food project in Mwanza, Tanzania / by Ellena Andoniou.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ravaging effects of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa are well known. \nCountries in the region are facing a crisis of unprecedented proportions further compounded by \npoverty, malnutrition and social inequalities. This is especially true in Tanzania, one of the \nworld?s poorest countries - where the majority of the population lives in absolute poverty; there \nis a disproportionately high level of food insecurity and poor nutritional standards are extensive. \nInitiated in 2003, The University of Western Ontario (UWO) in partnership with the National \nInstitute for Medical Research (NIMR), the Kivulini Women?s Rights Organization (KWRO) \nand a local women?s group, the Tukwamuane, launched a probiotic food based community \nproject in Mwanza, Tanzania - a high-need area as defined by the Canadian International \nDevelopment Agency. The Western Heads East (WHE) probiotic yoghurt project is an \ninternational collaboration fostering community health and development. The project is a microenterprise \ninitiative which aims to improve health and nutrition, while alleviating suffering from \nmalnutrition, diarrhoeal diseases, and urogenital disorders in vulnerable social groups in the \ncontext of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Women with little or no formal education are trained to \nproduce probiotic yoghurt for sale and subsidized distribution to People Living with HIV/AIDS \n(PLWHAs) at the community level. The project has the potential to foster health improvement, \nas well as empowerment, advocacy skills among women and promote knowledge transfer to \nfuture generations. \nHowever, at the inception of WHE, the necessary steps to develop key planning and \nevaluation frameworks were not taken. As such, the purpose of this project is to prepare a \nprogram planning and evaluation framework which will enable project planners, stakeholders, \nand researchers to evaluate project outcomes, the health impacts and improvements in quality of \nlife for the women making the yoghurt, their families and the broader community; as well as to \nexplore women?s perceptions (if any) of empowerment, and how the project is enabling them to \nachieve their everyday life objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".