MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024006242

Quantifying the Impacts of Flash Flooding on Dominica’s Material Stocks in Buildings: A GIS-based methodological framework for Small Island States

2023· dissertation· en· W7024006242 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Drive & Gear (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlash floodHazardContext (archaeology)Flood mythFlooding (psychology)Vulnerability (computing)Natural resourceNatural hazard
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economic growth is usually accompanied by extensive extraction of natural resources, especially in developing countries. From a “material-stock-flow-service” perspective, the substantial part (e.g., construction materials) of the extracted natural resources as inflows to a society get accumulated in the built environment as “material stocks” (MS). Depending on the end-use types of their containers, MS provide essential services to a society such as housing, education and transportation. When an environmental hazard strikes, MS lose their functionality due to the destruction of the physical structure of their carriers, resulting in extra construction waste that then must be cleared for recovery. To make a society more resilient to environmental hazards, which is especially important in small island states with limited natural and human resources, the knowledge of exposure of MS to hazard risk is critical.
\nThis research focuses on the quantity and spatial distribution of MS in buildings in the context of intense rainfall-triggered flash flooding in Dominica, a small island state in the Caribbean region. A Geographical Information System (GIS)-based stock-driven methodology is used to quantify four typical types of construction materials: concrete, aggregates, timber, and steel. To quantify exposed MS in buildings to flash flooding, an event-based flood model is used to generate flood inundation extents at the national scale. To investigate the degrees to which the exposed households are susceptible to the impacts of environmental hazards, this research also designs a resident survey to collect social factors contributing to household vulnerability to hazards. For 2020, the total MS in the building sector is estimated at 6,574 kt, equivalent to 91 t per capita, given Dominica’s population of the year. In terms of the distributions of MS in different material categories, concrete accounts for 86% of the total MS in buildings, followed by aggregate at 7%, timber at 4% and steel at 3%. Examining the exposure of MS in buildings to flash flooding, it is found that flood events of larger magnitudes would result in more MS contained in the exposed buildings. For flash flood events with 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year return periods, the numbers of exposed buildings are 2,781, 3,030, and 3,274, respectively, which contain 17%, 18%, and 19% of the total MS in buildings in Dominica. This research demonstrates how to link the results of material stock accounting to flash flood modelling, approaching the concept of socio-economic metabolism from an environmental hazard risk perspective. Knowledge of the quantity and spatial distribution of the exposed MS in buildings can assist local governments in making cost-effective mitigation plans before a hazard event. Although the designed survey was not implemented due to travel restrictions, it is a valuable instrument to collect the information about household vulnerability to environmental hazards, which can help hazard response agencies with more-efficient rescue operations during a hazardous event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207