Queerly Platonic: Constellating An Asian North American Critique of Compulsory Sexuality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This sandwich thesis critically intervenes in asexuality studies by critically examining compulsory sexuality, or the logic, discourse, and practice that centers sex and sexuality as natural and necessary parts of human life. Unfolding across four (published and in-press) chapters, it also offers a queer Asian North American approach to the complexities shared between asexuality and Asian North American lifeways as a means to consider the overlapping contexts of colonialism, white supremacy, imperialism, and transnational capitalism. Through an analysis of select digital visual culture between the years of 2019 and 2024, this thesis traces platonic intimacies across these cultural texts to meditates on how the platonic manifests as a queer practice of relationality. Chapter One, “Thinking Asexually: Sapin-Sapin, Asexual Assemblages, and the Queer Possibilities of Platonic Relationalities,” interrogates white-centric imaginaries in the asexual community by exploring platonic relationalities informed by Pilipinx ways of knowing and an analysis of digital illustrations on Tumblr. Chapter Two, “#PlatonicIntimacy: Asian North American Asexualities and Their Fairytales,” examines the fraught histories of asexuality and racialization, analyzing histories of compulsory sexuality and Asian North American life through an engagement with select photographs of non-binary Asian Canadians. In the second half of the thesis, Chapters Three and Four build upon these foundations by addressing the ongoing impact of compulsory sexuality in crisis times. Chapter Three, “Pandemic Asexuality, or Compulsory Sexuality in Risky Times,” explores how compulsory sexuality operates within crisis contexts, using tweets from 2020 and 2021 to highlight the entanglements shared between conceptions of health, asexuality, and intimacy. Chapter Four, “Ingat Ka Ha?,” presents a multimedia research creation piece that blends collage, poetics, and disability justice theory, offering a reflective meditation on care, relationality, and asexuality within Asian diasporic contexts. This thesis contributes to a growing body of scholarship that challenges compulsory sexuality and reimagines asexuality as a mode of theorizing relationality. Centering queer Asian North American perspectives, it envisions future research that continues to interrogate the intersections of asexuality with broader structures of power and offers a vision of social justice rooted in care and community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".