MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024074526

Quantifying mercury (Hg) release from coastal erosion along the Yukon coast, Canada

2025· other· en· W7024074526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostEctothermMercury (programming language)ArcticErosion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost stores large amounts of mercury (Hg), locking this toxic element in frozen soils across the Arctic. Mercury and its organic form methylmercury, in particular, is a neurotoxin which accumulates along the food chain. With increasing rates of coastal erosion driven by rising air and ground temperatures, Hg is being mobilized and released into the Arctic Ocean. This process does not only threaten local ecosystems but has broader implications, as Hg might be transported over long distances or taken up by marine organisms, posing risks to both wildlife and human health. To better understand such risks, we aim to quantify the amount of Hg that is stored in permafrost and released by coastal erosion along the Yukon Coast, Canada. Samples were taken from various landscape features including permafrost cliffs, active layer, and marine sediments along the Yukon Coast and on Herschel Island-Qikiqtaruk. We analyzed over 70 samples for elemental mercury, organic carbon, nitrogen, and grain-size distribution, and supplemented these results with existing data from previous field campaigns and the literature to create a regional database. Based on these data we will first estimate Hg stocks in the upper permafrost for the Yukon Coast. Combined with coastal erosion rates we will then estimate annual Hg fluxes into the ocean for this region. Together with Hg concentrations in marine sediments our findings will provide a clearer picture of the Hg stocks, fluxes, and its fate along the Yukon Coast. These data are crucial for decision makers and might help to assess Hg exposure to Arctic wildlife and human populations, whose diet largely relies on marine biological resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut)French-language works237,207