MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024081505

Primary Frequency Control with Flywheel Energy Storage Technologies

2017· dissertation· en· W7024081505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomatic frequency controlFlywheelRenewable energyWind powerEnergy storageElectric power systemFlywheel energy storagePhotovoltaic systemFrequency deviation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last decade, concerns about greenhouse gas emissions have increased. Different strategies have been developed to minimize those effects, leading to the development of renewable energy sources worldwide. In recent years, the deployment of solar photovoltaic and wind energy-based renewable generation technologies have been growing at a fast pace. The penetration of these technologies into the power system network introduces new challenges for frequency and voltage stability because of the intermittency of these energy sources, and the increasing risk of significant voltage/frequency variations.
\n
\nThe significant penetration of renewable sources requires fast regulation of the frequency deviations; hence, the implementation of primary frequency controls is necessary. There exists different techniques and strategies for primary frequency control, where governor regulation and under frequency load shedding are two of the best known, but these have several limitations regarding fast response. Thus, new control techniques based on energy storage systems, which are able to provide fast frequency control, are being studied. In this context, a flywheel energy storage (FES) system is studied and modeled in this thesis for frequency control in power systems, using the well-known software Dynamic Simulation Assessment Tool (DSATools)®, to allow researchers and practitioners to readily model FES in power system studies, particularly the Independent Electric System Operator (IESO) of Ontario.
\n
\nThe proposed FES DSATools® model is tested and compared using a previously proposed test system with a large wind energy system (WES), which creates significant frequency and voltage fluctuations due to its characteristics. The FES stores and delivers energy to the power system, as required by the network, through a back-to-back power electronic converter system. A frequency/speed limiter controller is used, considering the network frequency deviation and the FES rotational speed in the active control of the flywheel-side converter for active power control of the flywheel. A static var compensator (SVC) for voltage control is also studied. The presented studies consider disturbances from sudden changes in the wind speed, which affect the WES output active power, creating considerable problems for the test system's stability.
\n
\nThe simulation results suggest that the proposed FES model implemented on the system studied, provides effective primary frequency control, and it also improves the network voltage. Thus, the FES is shown to maintain system stability, increasing the operational efficiency of conventional and renewable generators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.144
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207