Rules of the Legislative Council & Legislative Assembly of Canada, in relation to private Bills, including divorce Bills (As amended in the Session of 1862).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Petition for any PrivateBill is ^^-g?'^?'^^f ceived by The House after the first three weeks of timeVor '' each Session ; nor may any Private Bill be pre-receiring.sented to The House, after the first four weeks of each Session ; nor may any Report of any Stand- ing or Select Committee upon a Private Bill be received after the first six weeks of each Session.52.-The Clerk of The House shall, during Clerk to each Recess of Parliament, [from and after the first ^^les^es- day of November in each year,] (a) publish weekly, pecting in the OflGicial Gazette, the following Rules, respect-lUi^^^^ ing Notices of intended applications for Private Bills, and in other newspapers (English and French) the substance thereof; [and shall also, immediately (a) These words occur in the Legislative Council Rule only.59046 4 RULES RELATIVE TO after the i.ssuc of the Proclamation convening Par- liament for the despatch of business, publish in the Official Gazette, and in other provincial news- papers, as aforesaid, until the opening of Parlia- ment, the day on which the time limited for receiving petitions for private bills will expire, pursuant to the foregoing Eule ;] W and the Clerk shall also announce, by Notice affixed in the committee rooms and lobbies of this House, by the first day of every Session, the times limited for receiving Petitions for Private Bills, and Private Bills, and Reports thereon.fbfpHvate ^^--^11 applications for Private Bills, whether Bills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".