MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024211171

Role of double-stranded RNA binding proteins, TRBP, ADAR1 and PACT, on PKR activation and HIV-1 production

2010· other· en· W7024211171 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein kinase RHEK 293 cellsEIF-2 kinaseActivator (genetics)RNAProtein kinase ARNA-binding proteinAntiviral proteinTransfectionRNA silencing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interferon-induced protein kinase RNA-activated (PKR) is activated after virus infection but not during human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection of lymphocytes. The TAR RNA binding protein (TRBP) counteracts the inhibitory effects of PKR on HIV-1 expression and replication. In U251MG astrocytes, which are low TRBP producers, PKR is activated upon HIV-1 transfection and viral production is low. Astrocytes overexpressing TRBP express more viral proteins. Expression of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA-1 (ADAR1)-p150 and its binding to PKR are increased during high HIV-1 replication. ADAR1 also reverses PKR inhibition of HIV-1 expression and production in HEK 293T and astrocytes. DNA- and RNA-binding domains of ADAR1 are required for PKR inhibition. Surprisingly, the PKR activator protein (PACT) also reversed PKR inhibition of HIV-1 expression in HEK 293T. These results indicate that three double stranded RNA binding proteins, TRBP, ADAR1 and PACT belong to a multiprotein complex that inhibits PKR function during HIV-1 infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.144
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→