Serbian Diplomatic Representatives in Constantinople from the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations to the Balkan Wars (1879–1912)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the establishment of bilateral relations between Serbia and the Ottoman Empire in 1879, the most educated and capable persons has been appointed and sent to the post of deputies. The capital of the Ottoman Empire for Serb national, political, economic and cultural interests was of paramount importance during the last quarter of the nineteenth and the first decades of the twentieth century. From Istanbul, educational policy was co-ordinated among Serb compatriots, and a deputy in Constantinople was in charge of all Serbian consuls in the Turkish provinces. A very responsible and demanding place of the diplomatic representative of Serbia on the Bosphorus was occupied by eminent Serbian scientists, politicians, statesmen. In the above chronological period, we distinguish, by quality and intensity, two periods. The first (1879–1903) is characterized by constant progress, of a moderate pace, while the features of the second (1905–1912) are stalled, tensions and frequent incidents. The official reports, as well as the private correspondence of Serbian Ministry of Foreign Affairs from this era, are valuable testimonials and are a true data mine for studying not only political, but also educational, ethnographic, cultural and economic circumstances of the period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".