Som & Fúria: uma leitura carnavalizada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Brazilian television series entitled Som & Fúria (2009) directed by Fernando Meirelles is a translation of the Canadian television series called Sling & Arrows (2003) into the Brazilian context. Both series portrait, in a televised format, four of William Shakespeare's major works: A Midsummer Night's Dream (1595-1596), Hamlet (1601), Romeo and Juliet (1597) and MacBeth (1623). The main objective of this research will be to analyze the systemic relations between Som & Fúria and the other languages that constitute it, such as theatrical language, for example. The research will have as a guiding principle the theory of Carnavalization, postulated by the russian theorist Mikhail Bakhtin (2010), in dialogue with the Semiotics of Culture, represented here by Lotman (1973) and Irene Machado (2003). The television format will be supported by Arlindo Machado (2001), Pallottini (2012), Balogh (2002) and Renato Pucci Jr (2011). Finally, Erika Fischer-Lichtie (1992), Pavis (2008) and Kowzan (2006) helped us to understand the semiotic constitution of theatrical language. Therefore, based on the concepts and paths described, we study, through clippings of scenes from the Brazilian television series, the process of systematization of its carnival language and the meanings produced from the dialogical relations between the signs that constitute it. We try to identify, in this way, the parts that form the systemic unit of the television series and that allow to observe an artistic object through a semiotic perspective. This course thus became an analytical study of exchanges, exchanges between the elements of Shakespearean theater, theater and television from the theories raised above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".