Second urbanHIST Conference. Interpreting 20th Century European Urbanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Word of Welcome Word of WelcomeThe two urbanHIST conferences are regarded as key activities and have been developed as means to discuss and disseminate the programme's core issues.Intended to open the internal discourse stepwise towards the international research community, the first congress, which was held at the Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice in October 2018, addressed mainly young scholars.The present urbanHIST conference in Stockholm sought for attracting a wider public regarding research experience as well as academic and regional background.Dedicated to the main theme "Interpreting 20 th Century European Urbanism", the thematic agenda of this conference relies on the commitment of the urbanHIST PhD candidates and is thus rather characterized by the emphases they recently set in their research.In this sense, all tracks have been proposed by the programme's doctoral students, who will co-chair them having a senior scientist aside.The selection of the invited keynote speakers furthermore displays the range of their research interests.Finally, three roundtables mark the link between the urbanHIST leitmotiv and the location of the conference.Two specific urbanHIST roundtables thematize the neglected planning histories in the European periphery, or argue the diversity of different research traditions regarding the history of the city and its planning process.The ArkDes roundtable, jointly organized by our partner institutions ArkDes and Boverket, addresses "Gaps in Sustainable Urban Development Research", a core issue in the Swedish planning discourse.We are grateful for the warm invitation by ArkDes to hold this special panel discussion at their museum, strengthening the bond between us.Having received more than one hundred applications for paper presentations, we are extremely proud to have reached so many international scholars.Even though urbanHIST focusses constitutively on European phenomena, we welcome researchers from four continents to this conference, a fact that demonstrates the international interest in the programme and its research field.The invited presenters and keynote speakers together with an almost complete urbanHIST consortium form a perfect setting for a lively and inspiring discussion on urbanHIST's key topics.This conference booklet collects all information on the many-faceted presentation tracks, keynote lectures, roundtable discussions, and other activities of the second urbanHIST conference.The first part offers an overview schedule and all necessary yet brief details.The second part lists all accepted abstracts written by colleagues, who unfortunately cannot join us in Stockholm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".