Second urbanHIST Conference. Interpreting 20th Century European Urbanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We warmly welcome you to the second urbanHIST conference in Stockholm "Interpreting 20 th Century European Urbanism".It is our great pleasure to introduce the urbanHIST project and the ideas behind the conference conception as background information for the setting of the present convention.urbanHIST is a current Horizon 2020 European Joint Doctorate programme that focusses on the history of European urbanism in the 20 th century.It developed a dual leitmotiv -consisting of the concept of multidisciplinarity and the ambition to gain a pan-European perspective -that forms a common thread through the whole programme.Consequently, the composition of the urbanHIST consortium, starting with the PhD candidates, their supervisors, the advisory board and representatives of the diverse partner organizations, corresponds with these two crucial ideas.Assembled from an international mix of researchers either born or educated in one or more of about 20 different European countries, the consortium members also represent a wide range of different academic backgrounds.They work in a research field around the intersection of urban and planning history, meaning they share their fundamental interest in the same subject: the city and its planned -or unplanned -transformations over the course of the long 20 th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".