United Kingdom Federation for Culture Collections: Newsletter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
{I}United Kingdom Federation for Culture Collections, Issue 29, 1998{/P} {/I}{B}{P}United Kingdom Federation for Culture Collections{/B}{/P} {I}{B}Newsletter{/I}{/B}{/P} {P}Edited by Dr. John Day {B}{P} Code Number:NL98005 {BR} Sizes of Files: {BR} Text: 49K {BR} Graphics: No associated graphics files {/P} {P}Editorial{/P} {/B}{P}Amongst other important subjects, this issue of the UKFCC Newsletter contains an update on the development of the United Kingdom National Culture Collection (UKNCC). {P}A further subject covered in this issue is the proposed changes to the UKFCC Statutes. {/P} {B}{P}The United Kingdom National Culture Collection (UKNCC){/B}{/P} {/B}{P}The Initiative to implement the UK Govermnents strategy for UK microbial collections has now been running for over two years. Just to remind you it brings together 9 National Collections (one on two sites) under the UK National Culture Collection (UKNCC). The Office of Science and Technology established the UKNCC following the Governments response to an independent Review of UK Microbial Culture Collections. {B}{P}World Federation for Culture Collections: associate membership for UKFCC members{/P} {/B}{B}{P}The WFCC: Its Present Activities and Plans for the Millennium{/B}{/P} {P}The WFCC has had an active period promoting the work of the Federation, operating both through its executive board and committee members, and in a general consultancy capacity to other organisations. It is now planning for the new millennium.{/P} {B}{P}UKFCC Bursary Competition{/P} {/B}{P}The UKFCC Bursary to attend the XVIIth European Culture Collection Organisation (ECCO) meeting at VTT, Espoo, Finland from 24th - 26th June 1998 was awarded to Dr RA Fleck. An abstract of the paper he presented "{I}Development of effective preservation procedures for use in culture collections"{/I} is published {/P} {P}{B}Report on the UKFCC Student Bursary (Summer 1998){/P} {/B}{P}Morphological and temperature studies on a selection of{I} Ganoderma {/I}isolates from the CABI BIOSCIENCE Genetic Resources Collection, formerly IMI.{/P} {B}{P}Report on: World Federation for Culture Collections (WFCC) Workshop: {BR} The economic value of microbial genetic resources{/P} {/B}{P}The Workshop was held at the Eighth International Symposium on Microbial Ecology (Halifax, Canada, August 12th 1998){/P} {P}NOTE: A full report with extended abstracts, bibliography, background documents etc will be published by the WFCC; this will also be made available on the WFCC Web Site {B}{P}MOSAICC Developments{/P} {/B}{P}The EU supported project to develop guidelines (or a voluntary code of conduct) for the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) by culture collections and microbiologists in general is reaching its final stage. The second meeting of the steering group takes place at the beginning of February 1999 in Brussels and additional participants will be invited to attend and contribute to the final development of the guidelines.{/P} {B}{P}Future UKFCC Meetings{/P} {B}{P}Meetings of Interest{/P} {B}{P}UKFCC Committee Members{/P} {B}{P}UKNCC Service Culture Collections {/P} {B}{P}Sustaining Members{/P} {B}{P}STATUTES OF THE UK FEDERATION for CULTURE COLLECTIONS{/A}{/P} {B}{P}UKFCC Training Course on the Preservation and Maintenance of Microorganisms and Cell Lines {/B}{BR} 26-28 April 1999{/P} {P}Copyright UKFCC 1998
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.552 | 0.496 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".