Trajectoires fluides et croisements lumineux : \nhistoire du verre d’art au Québec dans le contexte d’Expo 67
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this thesis is to propose the first historical account and contextual narrative of the artistic practice of glassblowing in Québec. The analysis begins in 1960, with the founding of industrial units in Montréal by Venetian glassblowers and ends in 1990, with the establishment of the college-level glass program at Espace verre. Expo 67 was a major event in the development of this field of cultural production in Québec but also, more widely, in North America and in Europe. Indeed the world’s fair held in 1967 in Montréal played a crucial role with regard to the production, distribution, reception, teaching and institutionalization of glass art in Québec and internationally. This thesis thus traces the biographies of actors and networks of actors – consisting of people, objects and practices – all of which are connected in some way to Expo 67, as well as the effect of these intersecting trajectories on the subsequent development of glass. In the particular social context of Québec during and following the Quiet Revolution, artistic glassblowing mostly emerged within the larger category of métiers d’art. In this shifting socio-cultural landscape, artisanal productions were invested with different values, linked to the negotiation of status and identity. In a theoretical sense this thesis shows how the development of the field of artistic glassblowing was articulated through the shifting status of categories such as métiers d’art, design, industry, architecture, and the visual arts. In fact, the hybrid practices and spaces of convergences between these categories are emphasized in this account. The ambiguous cultural status of glassblowing in Québec necessitated an interdisciplinary approach, drawing on the scholarship of Arjun Appadurai and Igor Kopytoff (the biography of things), Bruno Latour (the actor-network theory), as well as that of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".