Valores em serviços de policiamento comunitário: o programa ronda no quarteirão sob a ótica da teoria da cadeia de meios e fins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growth of violence, the even more intense preoccupation of citizens in search of security, and management strategies adopted by private organizations have contributed for new measures adopted by the police, in partnership with the society, in order to decrease criminality. Observing this scenario, it is easy to see that police organizations have verified that the citizen is co-author of his/her own security. However, the communitarian police are an alternative that may give people only the sensation of welfare. This research had the objective to identify, under the view of Jail Theory Means End-Chain, the structure of values belonging to users of communitarian police services: The Quarter Police Patrol in Fortaleza-CE. It was used, as base, the identification of service attributes received by users and their relations, consequences by using this service, as well as personal values of the individuals. Thirty users of the Quarter Police Patrol were interviewed. Aging from 25 to 60, they were residents or workers in the downtown area, Jangurussu or Barra of Ceará neighborhoods that received the visit of the Quarter Police Patrol during the months of August or September, 2009. The neighborhoods above mentioned presented the greatest number of crime acts in that period. Interviews were held from October to December, 2009. It was used the laddering technique which allows the construction of the Hierarquical Value Map, showing the elements that characterize the consumers‟ behavior when using such service. Results show the preoccupation that the Quarter Police Patrol‟s users have concerning the reach of their comfort and welfare which will be able to be acquired by putting in practice the following values: love what you do, friendship, citizenship, defend your home land, happiness, honesty, satisfaction, security and be useful to society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".