MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025483117

Wind redistribution of snow impacts the Ka- and Ku-band radar signatures of Arctic sea ice

2023· article· en· W7025483117 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und TechnologieSwiss Polar InstituteBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionCanada Research ChairsNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyUniversity College LondonMarine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response NetworkEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
KeywordsSea iceSnowRadarBackscatter (email)Sea ice concentrationSatelliteWind speedArctic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind-driven redistribution of snow on sea ice alters its \ntopography and microstructure, yet the impact of these processes on radar \nsignatures is poorly understood. Here, we examine the effects of snow \nredistribution over Arctic sea ice on radar waveforms and backscatter \nsignatures obtained from a surface-based, fully polarimetric Ka- and Ku-band \nradar at incidence angles between 0∘ (nadir) and 50∘. \nTwo wind events in November 2019 during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for \nthe Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition are evaluated. During both events, changes in Ka- and \nKu-band radar waveforms and backscatter coefficients at nadir are observed, \ncoincident with surface topography changes measured by a terrestrial laser \nscanner. At both frequencies, redistribution caused snow densification at \nthe surface and the uppermost layers, increasing the scattering at the \nair–snow interface at nadir and its prevalence as the dominant radar scattering surface. The waveform data also detected the presence of previous \nair–snow interfaces, buried beneath newly deposited snow. The additional \nscattering from previous air–snow interfaces could therefore affect the \nrange retrieved from Ka- and Ku-band satellite altimeters. With increasing \nincidence angles, the relative scattering contribution of the air–snow \ninterface decreases, and the snow–sea ice interface scattering increases. \nRelative to pre-wind event conditions, azimuthally averaged backscatter at \nnadir during the wind events increases by up to 8 dB (Ka-band) and 5 dB (Ku-band). Results show substantial backscatter variability within the scan \narea at all incidence angles and polarizations, in response to increasing \nwind speed and changes in wind direction. Our results show that snow \nredistribution and wind compaction need to be accounted for to interpret \nairborne and satellite radar measurements of snow-covered sea ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUCL Discovery (University College London)Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207