MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025596361

Working Elements of a Dynamic Public Transport System

2024· dissertation· en· W7025596361 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic transportProcess (computing)Context (archaeology)Systems thinkingSemioticsKey (lock)Intelligent transportation systemPassenger information
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Working Elements of a Dynamic Public Transport System is a research and design study based on the development of a reinvented public transportation system for Grand Cayman in the Cayman Islands. The research explores the current travel landscape of the island as well as the public transportation industry on a global and regional level, applying relevant technologies and related systems. The proposed design includes a two-part system with dynamic capabilities to utilize communication through technology and increase efficiency. An installation was developed to explore changes in behaviour and current practices of public transportation users. Public transportation, systems in technology and specific technologies and design thinking are mobilized throughout Working Elements of a Dynamic Public Transport System. Design Thinking both as an underlying methodology and as research method builds on a user centric point of view to develop more responsive systems that utilize the island's existing transit routes. Cognitive Semiotics in the context of signs and symbols applicable to transit was used to help drive the research process and is applied to drive the research process and Thinking Through Making in several creation of the prototypes and the final thesis exhibition. 
\n
\nKeywords: Transportation, Urban Design, Technology, Innovation, Communication

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)Same topicWood Treatment and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207