MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026633488

ADSORPTION OF CIPROFLOXACIN FROM WATER BY ADSORBENTS DEVELOPED FROM OAT HULLS

2018· dissertation· en· W7026633488 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionHydrolysisBacteriaAntibacterial agent
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water contamination with antibiotics is a serious threat for human health as the presence of antibiotics in water can cause antibiotics resistance in pathogens. Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is one of the most frequently detected antibiotics in water. Adsorption has shown to be one of the promising methods for removal of antibiotics from water. Although a number of adsorbents were investigated previously for removal of CIP from water, precursors in use were expensive, and scarce in some parts of the world. As such, development of adsorbents made of abundantly available and inexpensive raw materials, which can simultaneously offer high CIP adsorption capacity, is needed. In this work, for removal of ciprofloxacin (CIP) from water, adsorbents were developed from raw oat hulls. Raw oat hulls were pretreated by using phosphoric acid impregnation and microwave heating, respectively. Surface morphology and surface area of raw and pretreated oat hulls were investigated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and surface area analysis, respectively. Results indicated substantial enhancement in adsorbents’ porosity and remarkable increase in surface area after the pretreatment procedure. Effects of influential parameters such as solution pH, adsorbents dose and temperature on CIP adsorption capacity were studied. Results revealed that the optimum adsorbents dose was 0.3 mg/L and the optimum pH value was 7. CIP adsorption equilibrium and kinetic were investigated at three temperatures of 288, 298 and 318 K. The results were modeled using adsorption isotherms, and kinetic models. The maximum adsorption capacity obtained was 83 mg/g at the pH of 7 and a temperature of 318 K. The Freundlich model was the best to simulate the experimental data at all the three temperatures among the tested models. This suggested that adsorption of CIP took place on heterogeneous sites on the surface of the adsorbents. The pseudo second order model was the best fit to the kinetic data. This indicated that adsorption step may be the rate controlling mechanism of the process. Desorption experiments showed low desorption efficiency, hence implying strong interactions existing between CIP molecules and the adsorbent surface. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that CIP adsorption on pretreated oat hulls was spontaneous, endothermic along with an increase in entropy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207