Aménagement du paysage urbain : École d’architecture du paysage, 2003-2013
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book presents a selection of student projects from the Urban Landscape Planning Workshop of the School of Landscape Architecture of the Université de Montréal, conducted from 2003 to 2013. Creative solutions for public spaces and structures students show a great sensitivity to the quality of the living environment of a growing and diversified urban population. Very imaginative, the landscape proposals illustrated by freehand or digital drawings are based on a strong position on the place of nature in the city, in line with today's environmental concerns.\n\nBy presenting one or two projects from each academic year, the book reports on the evolution of the themes of the development of urban free space; While brownfield sites are taking center stage in the early 2000s, the greening potential marks the 2010s, accompanied by new trends such as urban agriculture, green roofs, water harvesting, etc. Richly illustrated, the book aims to highlight, like all landscaping workshops specific to the training of landscape architects, the contribution of the teachings and the student production to the reflection on the landscapes of the city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it