MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026680279

Apathy: Why Care? The Relationship Between Apathy and Cognition in Young Adults and Individuals with Cerebrovascular Disease

2021· dissertation· en· W7026680279 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Medicine, University of TorontoUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's UniversityCanadian Psychological AssociationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsApathyCognitionDepression (economics)DiseaseContext (archaeology)Anxiety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apathy is characterized by diminished goal-directed behaviour (e.g., lack of effort, initiative, and/or productivity), decreased goal-directed cognition (e.g., lack of interest in learning/pursuing new experiences), and blunted emotion (e.g., unchanging affect; Marin, 1991). Greater apathy is correlated with poorer social, physical, and functional outcomes (Kaufer et al., 1998; Starkstein, Federoff, Price, Leiguarda, & Robinson, 1993). Apathy may be present in both clinical and non-clinical populations, including individuals with stroke, dementia, depression, and healthy adults. Apathy is related to depression and is a common characteristic of dysexecutive syndromes. It may occur in conjunction with a variety of other clinical difficulties and comorbidities, complicating assessment and treatment (Marin, 1990). The purpose of the current dissertation was to advance our understanding of apathy, its relationship to depression, and its influence on cognition, in individuals with cerebrovascular disease and in young adults. This dissertation had three primary goals, which were addressed in five chapters. First, it explored how symptoms of apathy (i.e., decreases in goal-oriented behaviour, goal-oriented cognition, and/or emotional blunting) were related to cognition (i.e., memory and executive functioning) beyond the influence of depressive symptoms in individuals with cerebrovascular disease (Articles 1 and 2). Second, it examined the relative contribution of apathy and depression on cognition (particularly neutral and emotional memory) in young educated adults (N = 96), positing that apathy may impair overall cognitive performance to a greater degree than depression, but that depression may impact the type of emotional content that is remembered (Article 3). Last, it extended upon findings from Articles 1 and 2 by designing and implementing a randomized controlled trial (N = 72 stroke patients) to evaluate whether goal-setting could improve cognitive performance in the chronic phase after stroke (Article 4). These studies demonstrate the importance of a) screening for apathy (even in the absence of depressive symptoms), b) differentiating between apathy and depression, c) appreciating the relationship between apathy and cognition (e.g., executive function and memory) in young educated adults and in individuals with cerebrovascular disease, and d) demonstrating the utility of intervention tools (e.g., goal-setting) to enhance cognitive performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicHistorical Influence and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207