Analisis Kandungan Total Coliform Pada Minuman Susu Kedelai dan Higiene Sanitasi Usaha Kecil Menengah Susu Kedelai di Kota Padang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pengolahan susu kedelai yang tidak dilakukan secara higiene dapat meningkatkan \nkontaminasi produk susu kedelai oleh bakteri patogen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk \nmenganalisis kandungan Total Coliform pada susu kedelai dan higiene sanitasi usaha \nkecil menengah susu kedelai di Kota Padang. Penelitian dilakukan pada lima tempat \npengolahan susu kedelai dimana dilakukan tiga frekuensi pengambilan sampel. Total \nColiform dihitung menggunakan metode Most Probable Number (MPN) dan \ndibandingkan dengan SNI 01-3830-1995 tentang syarat mutu susu kedelai. Analisis \nhigiene sanitasi usaha susu kedelai menggunakan pertanyaan yang mengacu pada \nKepmenkes nomor 942 tahun 2003, dan dilakukan wawancara dan observasi kepada \npengolah susu kedelai. Hasil penelitian didapatkan kandungan Total Coliform yaitu \n1,54 MPN/ml;3,60 MPN/ml; 2,74 MPN/ml; 41,11 MPN/ml dan 4,2 MPN/ ml. Hasil ini \nmenunjukkan empat dari lima usaha susu kedelai memenuhi syarat mutu yaitu 20 mpn/ \nml. Usaha susu kedelai yang tidak memenuhi syarat mutu masih menerapkan dua dari \nempat aspek higiene sanitasi dengan kategori baik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".