Assessing the impact of Climate Change on the Performance of a Water System in Alberta Considering Multiple Representations of the Catchment Hydrology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ: Les changements rapides des conditions climatiques modifient les spécifications du cycle hydrologique à travers le monde, en particulier dans les régions froides. Ces changements peuvent affecter les caractéristiques du régime d'écoulement, telles que le volume annuel et le moment du débit de pointe. L'impact du changement climatique sur les systèmes hydrologiques est généralement évalué à l'aide des projections des modèles de circulation globale (GCM), qui sont utilisées comme données d'entrée pour les modèles hydrologiques afin de simuler les séries de débits naturels à l'avenir. L'objectif commun de ces modèles hydrologiques est de saisir les relations mathématiques entre les variables climatiques et hydrologiques. Les modèles hydrologiques peuvent différer en fonction de la résolution de leurs données d'entrée (locales ou basées sur une grille), des représentations des processus hydrologiques (ensemble de sous-bassins). L'estimation des conditions d'écoulement est potentiellement sensible à la structure du modèle hydrologique utilisé. Par conséquent, les résultats des évaluations de l'impact du changement climatique peuvent être affectés par le choix des modèles hydrologiques ainsi que par les données d'entrée. ABSTRACT: Rapid changes in climatic conditions are altering the specifications of the hydrological cycle across the world, particularly in cold regions. Such changes can affect the characteristics of the flow regime, such as annual volume and peak flow timing. The impact of climate change on water systems is commonly assessed using Global Circulation Models (GCMs) projections, which are used as inputs for hydrological models to simulate natural streamflow series in the future. The common goal of these hydrological models is to capture the mathematical relationships between the climatic and hydrological variables. Hydrological models may differ based on their input data resolution (local or grid-based), representations of hydrological processes (e.g., estimation of snowmelt), or assumptions related to the representation of catchment, e.g., lumped (one unit) or semi-distributed (set of sub-basins). The estimation of streamflow conditions is potentially sensitive to the structure of the utilized hydrological model. Therefore, the results of the climate change impact assessments can be affected by the choice of hydrological models as well as input data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".