MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026925738

Baked In Like a Muffin: the Culture of Whiteness in Ontario Elementary Schools

2022· dissertation· en· W7026925738 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOppressionRacismWhite (mutation)Critical consciousnessConsciousness raisingColonialismGraduation (instrument)White supremacyConsciousnessDominant culture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a newly certified teacher in 2015, I began my teaching journey in the Peel District School Board with limited experience developing my critical consciousness nor recognizing the importance of doing so. I thought teaching students equitably could be achieved by treating all students the same. One of the many issues with this mentality was my positionality as a white female dictated my understanding of equity in the classroom. My subconscious/conscious biases, assessments, resources, expectations of students and teaching strategies were influenced by the culture of whiteness. This influence and perpetuation stems from the socialization of race and colonialism, which has been ingrained into society for centuries (Goldberg, 1992; Feagin, 2013). This translates to racialized students experiencing racism and oppression throughout their schooling, which leads to lower graduation rates and educational outcomes (Carr, 2008; Dei, 2003; Lopez & Jean-Marie, 2021). Upon personal reflection, I see how I reinforced colonial systems in my teaching. This realization drove my desire to deepen my critical consciousness and conduct this work, as I share white intermediate teachers’ experiences reflecting on the culture of whiteness and systems of oppression within schools in the Greater Toronto Area. The following research questions guide this study: 1A) How is the culture of whiteness perpetuated by white intermediate teachers in the Greater Toronto Area? 1B) How does the culture of whiteness impact the pedagogies and resources teachers use in intermediate classes in Ontario? 2) What tools are white teachers using to mitigate the perpetuation of the culture of whiteness and develop their critical consciousness? 3) What changes need to be implemented to mitigate the perpetuation of the culture of whiteness in teaching (i.e., structural, institutional, and/or systemic)? These questions are addressed through data collected from semi-structured interviews that formed a single case study research design. The findings highlight how the culture of whiteness is maintained, tools to deepen one’s critical consciousness, as well as recommendations to disrupt the culture of whiteness in education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207