Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exhibition was the culmination of the first stage of the Bummock project (https://www.bummock.org/), led by Danica Maier and Andrew Bracey with invited artist Lucy Renton. During this stage of the five year research project, the artists worked with items chosen from the Nottingham Lace Archive, developing their individual works through collaborative residencies at Summer Lodge (Nottingham Trent University) and hARTslane Gallery London. \n \nLucy Renton chose 2 items from the archive from which to develop works through her Fine Art practice. \n1. The Period Guide - a manual of interior decoration \n2. Samples of synthetic knitted lace fabrics from the defunct Fryma fabric company \n \nHer exhibited works were: \n1. Modern Adaptation - a whole room installation, including a version of her work 'Richard & Judy' . Mixed media including canvas, acrylic and household paints, vinyl tablecloths, haberdashery, floor matting, vintage wallpaper and gouache. \n2. Swinger - radiator cover with acrylic and household paints, mirror screws \n3. A Bit of Skirt - vinyl tablecloths \n4. 2501 - screenprint on vinyl tablecloth fabric \n5. Also exhibited a vitrine containing the archive items. \n \nA Symposium also took place in connection with the opening of this exhibition. \nMusical compositions developed in conjunction with the works of Maier and Bracey were performed live or played via recordings throughout the exhibition. \nA series of public workshops took place during the exhibition. \n \nA publication documenting the exhibition and research questions and presentations from the Symposium is due in Autumn 2018 and will show works by all three artists including performance musical compositions developed in conjunction with the work of Maier and Bracey. \nFurther exhibitions of work from this project in the Nottingham Lace Archive took place at the Ruskin Gallery, Cambridge Jan - Feb 2019 and the Constance Howard Archive, Goldsmiths Nov-December 2019
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".