MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027228407

Characterization of differentially activated human B cells and effects of their soluble products on regulatory T cell suppressive function: assay development and design

2012· dissertation· en· W7027228407 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsT cellCD40B cellCellAntigenLigand (biochemistry)Antigen-presenting cellRegulatory T cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B cell depletion therapy with rituximab significantly decreases new disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients; however, these benefits do not correlate with a reduction in circulating or cerebrospinal fluid antibody levels. These findings implicate antibody-independent, pro-inflammatory roles of B cells in MS. Furthermore, in other autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), B cell depletion reportedly resulted in increased function of circulating regulatory T (Treg) cells. Since MS patients have been found to exhibit deficient Treg function, we hypothesized that activated B cells in MS patients can abnormally suppress the function of Treg cells. Therefore, B cell depletion with rituximab allows for restored Treg function, and the prevention of new autoimmune disease activity. In particular, we postulated that the abnormal pro-inflammatory cytokine profile secreted by MS B cells was responsible for defective Treg function. To begin studying the potential relationship between B and Treg cells, I optimized and validated an in vitro human B cell activation assay, as well as a human Treg suppression assay in healthy controls, to subsequently determine the effects of supernatants from differentially activated B cells on Treg suppressive function.Human B cells were isolated using magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), then stimulated with B cell crosslinking antibody (X), CD40 ligand (40), a combination of the two (X40), or CpG-nucleotides. Their supernatants were collected and responses found to support previously published findings. Treg and T responder (Tresp) cells were isolated using both MACS and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) techniques; then stimulated in coculture with and without B cell supernatants; and proliferation was determined by either standard beta scintillation counting (3H-TdR) or carboxyl-fluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution of Tresp cells. We found that Treg cells isolated using the MACS technique contain high numbers of contaminating CD4+CD25neg Tresp cells; are non-proliferative when stimulated alone; and do not robustly suppress Tresp cell proliferation. In contrast, FACS-isolated Treg cells have higher purity and are suppressive of Tresp cell proliferation and cytokine secretion. Suppression could be modulated by treating cells with either IL-10 to promote suppression, or Pam3Cys to decrease suppression, establishing the dynamic range of the suppression assay. When supernatants from B cells activated with CpG-nucleotides or CD40 ligation were added to the suppression assay, we did not find any significant changes. As such, this may reflect a more subtle biology than can be captured within this assay and still requires further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→