MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027269846

A comparative institutional analysis of Taiwan's organizational strategy for IT

2004· dissertation· en· W7027269846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWaseda University Repository (Waseda University) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInformation Technology Governance and Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndustrial Technology Research InstituteYork University
KeywordsInstitutional analysisInstitutional theoryQualitative comparative analysisOrganizational analysisGovernment (linguistics)Key (lock)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Part IV. Background and Analysis of CorporateOrganizational Strategies for the IT Businesses with Case Studies 2000, the total assets of these companies had surpassed US$34 billion (NT$920 billion)( 2001 pp.4-11).Remarkably, despite the global trend toward specialization, Japan and Korea are so entrenched in their traditionally vertically integrated business models that they have been totally ineffective in establishing a disintegrated manufacturing environment.In contrast, the U.S. IC industry has chosen to concentrate on high value-added design services, outsourcing manufacturing to partners who are overwhelmingly located in Taiwan.Other areas, including Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Israel, and Mainland China, have established some facets of the infrastructure that exists in Taiwan, but are far behind in terms of scale, range of services, and depth of expertise.Why then has Taiwan been successful in developing such a highly competitive disintegrated manufacturing environment?The following factors have been largely responsible:1. Strategic Clustering.In 1976, when Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) first transferred IC technology to Taiwan from RCA, it chose to cluster together all of the sectors that make up IC manufacturing technology, including design, mask making, wafer processing, and test.This resulted in a strong foundation for each sector of Taiwan's IC industry.ITRI's Dr. D. H. Hu led this project, and his contribution to the development of the IC industry in Taiwan should not be underestimated.2. Well Laid Foundation.Even earlier, in the 1970s, Taiwan was established as an assembly center for U.S. and Japanese IC manufacturers.This infrastructure would serve as a solid foundation for the future development of the assembly industry in Taiwan.(Win-Win Strategy).From the very beginning many local IC manufacturers chose to outsource assembly, allowing the as assembly houses to develop their own business and technology.UMC also actively sought to outsource mask production, in order to further its specialization and promote the development of the disintegrated 2. Know the trends, Go with the trends, and not end up against them. OEM Division of Labor3. Pay attention to the service-orientation of manufacturing and the trend towards internetoriented services.4. Be self-reliant for technology development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it