MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027390030

Causes and consequences of dispersal in a resident boreal passerine

2022· dissertation· en· W7027390030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological dispersalPasserineJuvenilePopulationBorealInclusive fitness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of the mechanisms governing, and the downstream effects of dispersal movements is essential to understanding the implications of dispersal for individual fitness, gene flow, and population dynamics. In this thesis, I integrate radio-tracking and long-term demographic data to investigate the causes and consequences of natal and breeding dispersal in a food-caching passerine, the Canada jay (Perisoreus canadensis), in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. In my first chapter, I review the literature to synthesize what is known about the causes and consequences of natal and breeding dispersal in birds. In my second chapter, I use radio-tracking data to examine the patterns of juvenile dispersal and survival in first-year Canada jays to demonstrate the survival consequences of delayed dispersal. In my third chapter, I combine radio-tracking and long-term demographic data to assess the effects of early-life social status and juvenile dispersal on direct and inclusive fitness. In my fourth chapter, I use long-term breeding dispersal data on Canada jays to examine the factors influencing adults to switch breeding territories between years. In my final chapter, I use long-term breeding dispersal and demographic data to investigate the short- and long-term fitness consequences of breeding dispersal in adults. Together, my thesis highlights how dispersal can carry-over to influence individual fitness, but also demonstrates that the causes and consequences of dispersal vary between juveniles and adults and according to social and environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→