MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027531258

Of the currently forming: an anthropology of traumatic brain injury

2013· dissertation· en· W7027531258 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryPublic healthPopulationEpidemiologyPoliticsPoison controlInjury preventionPopulation healthSuicide prevention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of The Currently Forming is an ethnographic exploration of a relatively recent diagnosis in clinical biomedicine – 'traumatic brain injury' or TBI. TBI has become a central preoccupation for researchers, clinicians, trauma centers, and public health departments across North America and Europe. Its epidemiological character is of startling concern, as its prevalence among the population is extraordinarily high. TBI is one of the most common causes of death in adults, and the leading cause of death and disability amongst young persons. Furthermore, TBI has become the "signature injury" of the US military in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Yet, the way we have come to know injury to the head and brain has changed fundamentally in the last thirty years. This has situated TBI as an important category for public and political debate; hospitals, neuroscientists, the CDC, and the WHO have all, within the last decade, narrowed their focus to traumatic brain injury – the "invisible injury" - as a cause for concern for both the public health sector as well as the clinical and laboratory sciences. The first section attempts to bring into focus why and how this problematic generated this kind of interest; it is one mode of understanding the dramatic visibility of an 'invisible' injury. The second section is about the conceptual and practical changes in clinical and experimental work on TBI and mild TBI today. Mild TBI, for instance, remains without widespread consensus as to its underlying pathophysiology or clinical presentation. Such indeterminacy has effectively opened up a new conceptual space for TBI research - particularly in the areas of neurological imaging and its relationship to neuropathology, applied clinical practices, post-injury assessments, and rehabilitation. Fundamental biomedical concepts – such as the 'normal' and 'pathological' – take on particular conceptual form in the midst of these spaces of uncertainty. Here, a series of ethnographic vignettes trace the interconnections and arrangements as certain clinical technologies and practices converge, giving shape to this dynamic and emergent diagnostic category. By superimposing the historical account of TBI's emergence alongside its ongoing clinical and experimental re-negotiations, Of The Currently Forming attempts to give a glimpse into the spaces of the incomplete – an exploration of the complexity, heterogeneity, and creativity that underpins contemporary brain injury medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.039
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→