Confronting America's Ambivalence towards Same-Sex Marriage: A Legal and Policy Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The entire chart (other than the information on Canada and Spain) was comprised of information obtained from the Harvard Law Review.12 Id.at 2008.These "registered partnerships" include most, but not all rights of heterosexual marriage.Id. 13 Id.The "same-sex unions" noted above grant fewer rights than "registered partnerships."Id. 14 Canada: the passage of the Civil Marriage Act in July 2005 made same-sex marriages legal throughout Canada.Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Same-Sex Marriage in Canada, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex-marriage-inCanada(last visited Sept. 24, 2005).The Canadian judiciary began steadily granting marriage rights to same-sex couples beginning in 1999 before the legislature passed the Civil Marriage Act.Id.Netherlands: became the first nation to ensure all rights of marriage to same-sex couples.See Harvard Law Association, supra note 10.Belgium: despite having
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".