DESA1002 'Nine Quarter City' - <Phillip Ji>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
My project is based on a residential building for which I°Øm designing in the city of Dubrovnik, Croatia. The city is known as a popular tourist destination, and commonly described as the °∞pearl°± of the Adriatic. Within the defensive walls, buildings of the city closely stand next to each other and leave out very limited public spaces and narrow streets in most parts of Dubrovnik. The concept of my design is heavily focused on the importance of space. Certain features such as the °∞leaning°± posture was used for my building, to symbolise the °Æsearch for space°Ø and °Æescaping the ordinary°Ø, etc. Furthermore - I wanted the outcome to be a building to not only challenge the Dubrovnik lifestyle and building style, but also add a new sense of community to its residents. At the same time I was looking for something that would stand out, not as an alien, but as a building that belongs to Dubrovnik. The building (of my design) itself consists of four floors of residential split into two individual units per level. Inside each unit, the setups of rooms are all similar to attract people alike. Other than the residential floors there is also a ground floor which accommodates a lobby and community room which act as a buffer zone for the transition from fully public areas into the residential. A roof garden is situated at the top of the building. Together with the ground level landscaping, the greeneries relate and reflect upon the nature of Dubrovnik°Øs city planning and tradition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".