Durham City Council Work Session February 20, 2025 (live stream)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
0:00 Call to Order 1:34 Roll Call 2:25 Announcements by Council 8:07 Priority Items by the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk 11:33 Administrative Consent Items 17:37 Citizens' Matters PULLED ITEMS 25:19 6. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Grant Project Ordinance for FY2021-2022 34:38 Amend City Clerk Report 37:23 9. 2024 Fourth Quarter Crime Report 38:53 12. Supplemental Agreement #5 to Master Agreement #18925 with WSP USA Inc. for Design of Multimodal Safety Improvements on City-Maintained Roads 42:06 13. Supplemental Agreement #3 to Master Agreement #18919 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for Design of Two-Way Conversion of Roxboro Street and Mangum Street 44:17 14. Second Amendment to the Contract with RATP Dev USA, Inc. for the Management, Operation, and Maintenance of the GoDurham Fixed Route Transit System 50:31 15. GoDurham FY2024 Annual Report PRESENTATIONS 51:18 9. 2024 Fourth Quarter Crime Report 1:49:47 22. Police Satisfaction Survey Results Presentation by ETC Institute 2:14:54 Break / Recess 2:19:57 21. FY 2024-25 Second Quarter Financial Report Supplemental Item 2:39:34 24. City Council Budget Requests FY2025-26 3:19:48 Settling the Agenda (one for vote for agenda items 1 - 20, General Business Public Hearings Item 23) 3:21:01 Adjournment Welcome to the Durham City Council Work Session for February 20, 2025 at 1 p.m. To view the meeting agenda, visit http://DurhamNC.gov/AgendaCenter. PLEASE NOTE: Comments left on this livestream will not be read or entered into the meeting record. For details on how to participate, visit https://www.durhamnc.gov/1345 To contact City Council members directly, visit https://www.durhamnc.gov/1323 Like: http://www.Facebook.com/CityOfDurhamNC Follow: http://www.Instagram.com/CityOfDurhamNC Listen: https://www.Spreaker.com/user/CityOfDurham - new! Visit: http://DurhamNC.gov
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.872 | 0.771 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".