MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027862858

Deep structural features in prospectivity mapping for epigenetic gold mineralization in the Red Lake – Stormy Lake region, Superior province.

2021· dissertation· fr· W7027862858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProspectivity mappingProspectionStatistical analysisGround-penetrating radar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Les gisements d'or épigénétique sont liés à des structures géologiques à différentes profondeurs de la croûte terrestre qui servent de conduits aux fluides hydrothermaux et carbonique-hydrothermaux. La province du Supérieur occidental au Canada abrite des gisements d'or de classe mondiale, comme dans le camp de Red Lake. Dans cette étude, des structures régionales profondes à angles élevés par rapport aux tendances lithologiques et structurelles générales ont été identifiées à partir de données aéromagnétiques, de pseudogravité et de gravité au sol filtrées pour accentuer les structures à différentes profondeurs. Par la suite, afin de produire un modèle statistique qui définit la relation spatiale entre les structures de cisaillement régionales et les gisements d'or épigénétiques, des algorithmes d'apprentissage automatique (spécifiquement les algorithmes Extreme Gradient Boosting et Random Forest) ont été entraînés sur une base de données comprenant une compilation des données géophysiques disponibles sur la zone d’étude ainsi que de nouvelles variables calculées par statistique spatiale sur ces mêmes données géophysiques. Le modèle XGBoost a permis d’identifier 85% à 88% des gisements connus dans la région avec une précision de 41%. L'évaluation du modèle à l'aide des Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) a classé les structures profondes à angle élevé par rapport à la tendance régionale comme étant plus importantes que les structures profondes parallèles à la tendance régionale. De plus, le SHAP a montré qu’il y avait une corrélation positive entre les structures profondes à angle élevé par rapport à la direction régionale et les gisements d'or connus, ce qui implique que les structures profondes ont fourni des conduits pour le fluide aurifère circulant du manteau à la croûte supérieure.<br /><br />Epigenetic (lode or orogenic) gold deposits are linked to geological structures at different crustal depths that act as conduits for hydrothermal fluids. The western Superior province in Canada hosts world-class Au deposits such as the Red Lake gold camp. In this study, deep regional structures at high angles to general mapped lithological and structural trends are identified from enhanced aeromagnetic, pseudo-gravity, and ground gravity data. Machine learning algorithms (notably the Extreme Gradient Boosting and Random Forest algorithms) were trained using a compilation of the geophysical datasets and engineered datasets from buffer analysis and spatial statistics calculated over the geophysical datasets to produce a statistical model that defines the spatial relationship between the regional shear structures and epigenetic gold deposits. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model recovered 85% to 88% of known deposits in the region with a precision of 41%. Evaluation of the model using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) ranked deep structures at a high angle to the regional trend higher than the deep structures parallel to the regional trend. In addition, the SHAP feature rankings showed a positive correlation between the deep structures at a high angle to the regional trend and known gold deposits, implying that deep structures provided conduits for auriferous fluid travelling from the mantle to the upper crust. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique)Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207