MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027883758

Developing Plant Cultivation Technologies for Space at DLR - From Antarctica to the Moon

2024· other· en· W7027883758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace researchGreenhouse gasGreenhouseUpgradeConsumablesLife support systemBiomass (ecology)StandardizationQuality (philosophy)ScheduleInternational Space Station
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By signing the Artemis Accords, spacefaring nations from around the globe have expressed their willingness to return astronauts to the Moon by the end of this decade. Unlike past lunar programs, Artemis aims to establish a long-term human presence on the surface of Earths natural satellite. A crewed outpost like the Artemis Base Camp requires a reliable supply of food and other consumables like oxygen. To address this need in a sustainable way, frequent resupply from Earth is not an option. Instead, a closed-loop bio-regenerative life-support system (BLSS) will be needed to produce fresh food and oxygen on-site, while eliminating carbon dioxide and other unwanted waste products. Thus, BLSS technologies have to be developed and field-tested in a space-analogue environment. To this end, DLR has founded the Planetary Infrastructures research group. The group has worked on BLSS for more than 10 years and has developed, built and operated the prototype-level greenhouse for space called EDEN (Evolution & Design of Environmentally-closed Nutrition-Sources) ISS at the German Neumayer-Station III in Antarctica. The purpose of this facility was to enable multidisciplinary research on topics related to plant cultivation on future human space exploration missions. Research on plant health monitoring, microbiology, food quality and safety, and human factors was conducted, while simultaneously validating the system. After 5 years in Antarctica and more than 1 ton of biomass produced, the greenhouse was shipped back to Germany, bringing the project to a successful end in 2023. The follow-on project, EDEN LUNA, is currently under development. Its goal is to refurbish and upgrade the existing Controlled Environmental Agriculture (CEA) subsystems, while also introducing new technologies like a robotic arm, nutrient recovery from urine, and AI-based risk mitigation. Additionally, the group is working on a realistic version of a Lunar Agriculture Module Ground Test Demonstrator (LAM-GTD) together with the Canadian Space Agency and other international partners. Designed for the lunar environment and dimensioned to be compatible with current launch vehicles and space standards, the LAM-GTD symbolizes the last step of analogue testing, paving the way for actual space missions to Moon and Mars. This paper summarizes lessons learned from EDEN ISS, while giving a status report on the development of the EDEN LUNA project. Moreover, a system overview for the LAM-GTD will be given, showcasing the most significant advances in BLSS technology at DLR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)French-language works237,207