MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027952618

The design of an SoC-based programmable controller development platform

2015· dissertation· en· W7027952618 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayController (irrigation)SuiteMicrocontrollerSoftwareDevelopment (topology)Interface (matter)Programmable logic controllerEmphasis (telecommunications)FPGA prototype
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents the development of the basis for an industrial controller based onSystem-on-Chip FPGA (SoC FPGA) technology as well as its accompanying suite of de-velopment tools. The objective of the project is to design an industrial controller devel-opment platform that can gracefully handle both high-level and low-level functionalities.A demonstration of Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) simulation with a graphical interface ona SoC FPGA using open-source software is one of the main pillars of the contributions ofthis thesis. First, a review of the embedded system design methodologies, the basics ofco-processor design, and of development environments is presented. Next, the controllerarchitecture's design process, which has produced multiple prototypes, is shown. The rstprototype uses a decoupled architecture with a separate Central Processing Unit (CPU) andField Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). A PCB demonstrating memory accesses from amicrocontroller has been designed. Another prototype simulates a decoupled architecturecomposed of a powerful ARM core and an FPGA connected by PCI-Express (PCI-e). Themost recent design is one based on SoC FPGA technology. To show the possibilities ofthis platform, a suite of example digital IP cores have been designed and simulated. Fur-thermore, a collection of development tools has been assembled and congured to enabledevelopers to use this platform. In addition to the standard GNU tools, the thesis putsan emphasis on the modication of open-source simulation software to enable developmentwith HIL simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207