MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027981705

De la déclaration non financière au reporting de durabilité : les nouveaux défis pour les analystes et les auditeurs financiers

2023· preprint· fr· W7027981705 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical Research and Islamic Perspectives
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Government (linguistics)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

les nouveaux défis pour les analystes et les auditeurs financiers Maria NICULESCU, professeur d'université, Roumanie Alain BURLAUD, professeur émérite, Cnam/Lirsa, France Résumé Dans le contexte des crises écologiques et sociétales récurrente, les institutions européennes se sont engagées à favoriser un développement durable qui réponde aux besoins des générations actuelles et futures, tout en offrant de nouvelles possibilités d'emploi, d'investissement et de croissance économique.Ces engagements constituent le fil conducteur des politiques et stratégies européennes en matière de financement d'une croissance durable, de transition verte, de construction d'une économie au service des citoyens.Ils ont été transposés progressivement dans un nombre important de textes réglementaires européens, dont celles portant sur la publication d'informations en matière de durabilité par certaines catégories d'acteurs économiques et financiers.L'importance des changements de paradigme alimente la réflexion sur le rapport entre cette nouvelle réglementation 1 et la réalité sociale, dans laquelle et sur laquelle elle doit agir.S'inscrivant dans ce cadre, cet article est un document de réflexion sur les évolutions, notamment conceptuelles, axiologiques et substantielles apportées par la Directive (UE) 2022/2464 et leur traduction en innovations juridiques et pratiques.Basé sur une vaste recherche documentaire dans la littérature de spécialité et la législation européenne, sur l'analyse de contenu et l'analyse secondaire de nombreuses études scientifiques en la matière, notre contribution se concentre sur la portée du changement de syntagme « information non financière » en « information en matière de durabilité » et sur le nouveau rapport entre le droit et la réalité sociale crée par la Directive (UE) 2022/2464.Les auteurs partent de l'hypothèse que de tels éclaircissements constituent une condition préalable à la mise en place de cette directive, mais aussi de transformation réussie de certaines professions sur lesquelles elle a une incidence considérable, dont celles d'analystes et d'auditeurs financiers.Cela induit, à la fois, des changements en amont des enseignements universitaires et de la formation continue en la matière, mais aussi des programmes de recherche. SummaryIn the context of recurrent ecological and societal crises, the European institutions are committed to fostering sustainable development that meets the needs of current and future generations, while providing new opportunities for employment, investment and economic growth.These commitments are the guiding principle of the European policies and strategies in terms of financing sustainable growth, green transition, and building an economy at the service of citizens.They have been gradually transposed into a large number of European regulations, including those on sustainability disclosure by certain categories of economic and financial actors.The importance of the changes imposed feeds the reflection on the relationship between these new regulations and the social reality, in which and on which they must act.Including of the same framework, our contribution is a reflection document on the conceptual, axiological, and substantial evolutions brought by the Directive (EU) 2022/2464 and their translation into legal and practical innovations.Based on extensive literature research, content analysis and secondary analysis of numerous scientific studies in the field, our contribution focuses on the scope of the change from "non-financial information" to "sustainability information" and the new relationship between law and social reality created by the Directive (EU) 2022/2464.The authors start from the hypothesis that such clarifications are a prerequisite for the successful transformation of certain professions on which this Directive has a considerable impact, including those of financial analysts and auditors.This leads to changes upstream of university curricula and continuing education in this area, but also in research programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.156
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.444
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1560.444
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0180.012
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0140.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicMedical Research and Islamic Perspectives→French-language works237,207→