Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'Association canadienne des sociologues et des anthropologues de langue franaise (ACSALF) organise son colloque gnral sur le thme des (in)disciplines.L'invitation s'adresse aux anthropologues et sociologues ceux et celles qui partagent leurs perspectives d'enqute et d'analyse.Notre ambition est d'offrir une comprhension plus affine des phnomnes qui transforment et faonnent les mondes contemporains, tout en explorant de nouvelles avenues en termes de conceptualisation et d'analyse. Modalits de soumission des propositions Communications individuellesSoumettre un rsum de 250 mots et de trois cinq mots-cls.Le rsum doit tre accompagn du nom de l'auteur, son affiliation (institution et dpartement), son adresse courriel et ses coordonnes postales.Ateliers L'organisateur de l'atelier doit soumettre un rsum de 350 mots, trois 5 mots-cls.Les rsums (250 mots) des communications de chacun des participants pourront tre soumis au mme moment ou la suite de l'acceptation de l'atelier.Veuillez noter que les ateliers se composent de quatre ou cinq communications, en plus d'un prsident rapporteur, le cas chant.Le rsum doit tre accompagn du nom de l'organisateur et de ceux des participants (si connus), de leurs affiliations (institution et dpartement), de leurs adresses courriel et leurs coordonnes postales.L'organisateur de l'atelier est responsable du recrutement des participants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".