MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7028163230

Emergent paradigms and experiential perspectives : towards place responsive planning in Nunavut

2004· dissertation· en· W7028163230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExperiential learningPerspective (graphical)Process (computing)NarrativeAgency (philosophy)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there has been a trend towards devolution in govemance.This trend presents particulff promise for Northem and Aboriginal residents, many of whom have intensified their appeals for serf-determination, arguing that existing governance structures do not adequately accommodate their unique needs and intefests.As planning is inextricably linted to govemance, the discipline inevitably assists in facilitating or restricting the development of devolved govemance forms.For Northem and Aboriginal residents, therefore, the direction of planning practice warants serious consideration.This thesis situates the present position of pianning in the North, in view of determining how the discipline can assist in structuring more place ¡elevant and culturally sensitive govemance forms in Nunavut.The study traces the paradigmatic devel0pment of the discipline to discuss how conventional, ¡ational planning theories have generally failed to engender place relevant policy.Emergent viewpoints on place are then explored and aligned with transformative planning theories in an attempt to offer new perspectives on place sensitive social policy construction.This study draws on the experiential perspectives of Northern p¡actitioners to further situate the position of pranning in Nunavut.The empiricar resea¡ch focuses on connecting planning theory to practice, merging emergent conceptual viewpoints with the analysis of existing planning infrastructures.The thesis concludes that Northern planners are wetl situated to assist in structuring more place relevant and culturally sensitive govemance forms.A series of ¡ecommendations is provided as a tool to guide practitioners in their efforts to help develop those forms.'conceptual boxes' (Roberts, 2000) from within which p¡actitioners have fashioned research and practice are altering, giving way to the emergence of new guiding policy frameworks, or paradigms, as this study has identified them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.030
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicIndigenous Studies and Ecology→French-language works237,207→