El certame literariu “Versos a Oliegos”: l’apreciu de la cultura y la llengua cepedanas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the early hours of November 28th 1945, the residents of Oliegos de Cepeda were forced by the administration to leave their homes, jobs, people, and also their ancestral lands, due to the construction of the Villameca dam. The conditions of the expropriation were particularly harsh, although at that time the sacrifice made in favour of so-called progress was regarded as positive by the community. At the end of their journey, in Castile, was thedistant estate of the Marqués de la Conquista, in the lands surrounding the village of Foncastín (Rueda, Valladolid) where their future was to be built. Many years later, in 2001, thanks to the good will and work of Tomás Álvarez, the first poetry contest “Verses to Oliegos” was held, which was followed by a meeting of people from La Cepeda and neighbouring areas. The main lines of this itinerant annual meeting were established that year, aiming to providea discussion forum dedicated to pay homage through poems or thoughts written in prose to the people of Oliegos who were forcibly removed from their homes. Today, nearly a quarter of a century after its beginnings and due to the wide range of topics discussed, “Verses to Oliegos” can be considered a milestone in the understanding of the history, culture and language of La Cepeda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".