MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028209636

El certame literariu “Versos a Oliegos”: l’apreciu de la cultura y la llengua cepedanas

2025· other· en· W7028209636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia (University of León) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryQuarter (Canadian coin)CONTESTAdministration (probate law)ExpropriationMilestone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the early hours of November 28th 1945, the residents of Oliegos de Cepeda were forced by the administration to leave their homes, jobs, people, and also their ancestral lands, due to the construction of the Villameca dam. The conditions of the expropriation were particularly harsh, although at that time the sacrifice made in favour of so-called progress was regarded as positive by the community. At the end of their journey, in Castile, was thedistant estate of the Marqués de la Conquista, in the lands surrounding the village of Foncastín (Rueda, Valladolid) where their future was to be built. Many years later, in 2001, thanks to the good will and work of Tomás Álvarez, the first poetry contest “Verses to Oliegos” was held, which was followed by a meeting of people from La Cepeda and neighbouring areas. The main lines of this itinerant annual meeting were established that year, aiming to providea discussion forum dedicated to pay homage through poems or thoughts written in prose to the people of Oliegos who were forcibly removed from their homes. Today, nearly a quarter of a century after its beginnings and due to the wide range of topics discussed, “Verses to Oliegos” can be considered a milestone in the understanding of the history, culture and language of La Cepeda. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia (University of León)French-language works237,207