The effects of Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stobe L.) on grassland plants and soils in British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In British Columbia, grasslands provide critical habitat for a wide variety of species and are a significant forage base for BC’s ranching industry. Grasslands in BC are threatened from several human-caused stressors, including urban development, over-grazing, climate change and the introduction of non-native invasive species. Spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L.), is an invasive plant introduced to North America from Europe. It can establish large monocultures in BC’s grasslands which can cause a reduction in wildlife and livestock forage production, a lowering of native biodiversity, and an alteration in soil nutrient composition. I investigated the carry over effects immediately following removal of large and small spotted knapweed patches on soil mineral nutrients (nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), carbon (C) and volumetric water content) and the growth of an important native grass, rough fescue (Festuca campestris Rydb.), in grasslands within Lac du Bois Provincial Park, located to the northwest of the city of Kamloops, British Columbia. The results of field experiments showed that soil total nitrogen, total carbon, volumetric water content and biomass of rough fescue were lower in former spotted knapweed patches, but there was no significant difference in soil total phosphorus. In addition, there was no measureable difference between large and small spotted knapweed patches in soil mineral nutrients and plant growth. In a greenhouse experiment I manipulated N:P ratios (1:1, 15:1 and 30:1) and biochar (10g/pot or none) to test their effect on competitive performance between spotted knapweed and rough fescue. The experimental design included five plant combinations: spotted knapweed alone, rough fescue alone, two spotted knapweed, two rough fescue, one spotted knapweed and one rough fescue. The results of the greenhouse experiment showed that total biomass of spotted knapweed was greater than rough fescue at each N:P ratio when they were grown alone or grown under intraspecific condition. Also, results showed that the competitive effect of spotted knapweed was -0.136 ± 0.052 SE; while rough fescue has a facilitation effect of 0.020 ± 0.007 SE. Biochar addition had no effect on plant growth of spotted knapweed or rough fescue, or competitive interactions within and between the two plant species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".