MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028293166

Evaluation of Passive Microwave-Based Sea Ice Edge and Marginal Ice Zone

2024· dissertation· en· W7028293166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSea ice concentrationSea ice thicknessDrift iceAntarctic sea iceArctic ice packCryospherePolar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea ice is a vital factor in polar navigation, numerical weather prediction models, and climate change studies. It significantly influences the global climate, northern communities, and Earth’s ecosystems. The sea ice edge and marginal ice zone are important areas for monitoring, as they affect ship navigation, human activities, and marine habitats. Passive microwave instruments offer valuable tools for monitoring the Earth’s surface, regardless of solar illumination. This advantage is particularly prominent in polar regions, where harsh climate conditions, restricted accessibility, and polar darkness pose challenges to data collection. This thesis is dedicated to the analysis of the sea ice edge and the marginal ice zone obtained from passive microwave algorithms, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of these influential regions. The first research compares the sea ice edge derived from three passive microwave algorithms against Canadian Ice Service charts over the Eastern Canadian Arctic. It also introduces a novel measurement for edge displacement error. The findings demonstrate differences in the performance of various algorithms across different seasons. During the freeze-up period, there is an increase in edge displacement error values, attributed to thin ice conditions. In April, the study observed the widest range of edge displacement error values, which were linked to fluctuations in wind speed and air temperature. The second study focuses on a 40-year trend analysis of the Arctic marginal ice zone using the Bootstrap sea ice product, employing two definitions: one based on sea ice concentration and the other based on sea ice concentration anomaly. Comparative analysis shows consistent trends in marginal ice zone fraction, with the anomaly-based definition exhibiting higher values during transitional periods. Furthermore, change point detection analysis highlights an increase in marginal ice zone fraction after 2005 for the concentration-based definition and after 2007 for the anomaly-based definition, suggesting the influence of climate change on sea ice concentration and mobility. In the third investigation, two sea ice products, passive microwave and synthetic aperture radar, are utilized to delineate the marginal ice zone in the Greenland Sea using two distinct definitions. The anomaly-based definition reveals a broader spatial marginal ice zone region, capturing the variability in sea ice concentration resulting from ice growth. This definition also maintains consistency across both sea ice products. Additionally, the study underscores the consistency of synthetic aperture radar in detecting the marginal ice zone (regardless of the definition) and its reduced sensitivity to the sea ice concentration anomaly standard deviation threshold, compared to passive microwave data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207