MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028437410

Evolution in natural populations: Molecular marker-based inference of life history and quantitative genetic data

2008· dissertation· en· W7028437410 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSocial and Demographic Issues in Germany
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNatural selectionSelection (genetic algorithm)Variation (astronomy)InferenceGenetic variationNatural (archaeology)Life history theoryGenetic variability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I develop and apply techniques that use molecular markers to infer critical evolutionary patterns in natural populations in general, and in particular to brook charr, 'Salvelinus fontinalis', inhabiting Freshwater River, Cape Race, Newfoundland. To facilitate quantitative genetic and other evolutionary analyses, I developed techniques to aid in the collection of pedigree information and to facilitate power and sensitivity analyses. Based on estimates of genetic differentiation and direct estimates of individual movement Freshwater River brook charr are uniformly and relatively mobile throughout their life cycle. Using molecular markers to infer the relationship between body size and reproductive success, I obtained qualitatively different predictions of optimal life histories from previous estimates for which such molecular data and techniques were not available. My estimates suggest that early maturity is adaptive in this population, relative to estimates that have not been informed by molecular data to relate body size to reproductive success. My estimates explain some of the variation in age at first maturity in Freshwater River brook charr, and furthermore provide the first example of a qualitative difference between optimal life histories as evaluated with and without the use of molecular markers. Finally, I used molecular markers to provide both pedigree information and fitness information, via the recognition of surviving individuals, to measure natural selection on genetically-based variation in body size in Freshwater River brook charr. These pedigree and survival data allowed me to attempt the first explicit use of estimated genetic covariances to remove bias in estimates of natural selection due to environmentally-induced relationships among phenotypic variation and fitness components. I obtained no evidence of a relationship between body size and viability at either phenotypic or genetic levels. Thus the evolution of body size is at least partially constrained by a lack of selection and the currently observed distribution of growth rates is resolvable with the form of viability selection in this system. However I showed that body size is positively phenotypically related to early maturity, which I have shown to be adaptive in this study system. Thus the lack of evolution of larger body size and of earlier maturation remains unexplained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it