MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028468726

Expansion of the CD8 memory T cells : implications for the self-renewal gene Hoxb4

2016· other· en· W7028468726 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCD8Adoptive cell transferCytotoxic T cellTransplantationT cellStem cellTransgeneMajor histocompatibility complex
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD8 memory T (Tm) cells provide life long protection against recurrent infections and are maintained through self-renewal mechanisms.Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) also possess the capacity to slowly self-renew assuring their long-term maintenance.Both cell types use the bone marrow as their preferred proliferation niche.CD8 Tm and HSC partially share a transcriptional profile including some genes known to control self-renewal.Hox genes are expressed in HSCs, among them Hoxb4 is a potent enhancer of HSC expansion in vitro and in vivo.Based on the similarities between HSC and Tm cells, we hypothesize that genes involved in HSC self-renewal, like Hoxb4, will promote CD8 Tm cell expansion.To test this hypothesis, we have determined the effect of Hoxb4 overexpression in T cells from young and old transgenic mice, and on the engraftment and maintenance of CD8 Tm cells after transplantation into immunocompetent or immunodeficient mice.At the steady-state, the composition and phenotype of the naïve and memory T cells were not affected by Hoxb4 overexpression.To study CD8 Tm cell maintenance, the Hoxb4 and the OT-1 transgenic mice were crossed; the latter express a T cell receptor that recognizes the ovalbumin (OVA) peptide, presented by major histocompatibility complex class I. Using this model, we generated in vitro large numbers of monoclonal and OVA specific CD8 Tm cells for adoptive transfer experiments.The number and the phenotype of Tm cells generated in culture were not affected by Hoxb4 overexpression.These cells were transplanted into wild type mice to evaluate their engraftment and long-term maintenance.After transplantation in either immunocompetent or immunodeficient mice, Hoxb4 overexpressing Tm cell engraftment or maintenance was not enhanced when compare to wild-type Tm cells.These results demonstrate that Hoxb4 does not promote CD8 Tm cell self-renewal.Further studies will try to identify the factors controlling CD8 Tm cell self-renewal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207