MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7028527197

[ESPN-TV] Red Wings vs Blues: Live Stream (NHL Hockey Online 2019)

2019· other· en· W7028527197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluesMaroonHeading (navigation)Falling (accident)The Thing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Detroit Red Wings will look to build on back-to-back victories after a 3-2 win over the New York Rangers in their last outing. Franz Nielsen opened the scoring for Detroit late in the 1st and Andreas Athanasiou doubled the lead with the lone goal of the 2nd period, taking a 2-0 lead into the 3rd period. Watch Live:: https://247itv.info/ice-hockey Watch Live:: https://247itv.info/ice-hockey New York got on the board late in the 3rd, but Athanasiou would score an empty-netter to push the lead to 3-1. The Rangers pulled a goal back with :10 to go to make things interesting, but it was too little too late as Detroit held on for the victory. Jimmy Howard got the win to improve to 19-20-5 this season, stopping 41 of 43 shots faced in the winning effort. The St. Louis Blues will look to build some steam after putting out a 7-2 thumping of the Edmonton Oilers in their last outing. Jaden Schwartz opened the scoring for St. Louis with the lone goal of the opening period. Alex Pietrangelo doubled the lead just :27 into the 2nd before Schwartz scored his 2nd of the game and David Perron made it 4-0 just 1:32 apart. Edmonton scored a pair of late goals to cut the deficit in half heading into the 3rd but Perron would score his 2nd of the game, Patrick Maroon would get on the scoresheet and Schwartz would complete his hat trick as the Blues piled on in the 3rd. Jordan Binnington picked up the win between the pipes to improve to 18-4-1 after stopping 15 of 17 shots faced in the winning effort. Detroit is 16-36 in their last 52 games overall and 15-37 in their last 52 road games while the under is 5-2 in their last 7 games as an underdog. St. Louis is 8-2 in their last 10 home games and 17-8 in their last 25 games overall while the under is 5-1 in their last 6 games as a home favorite. Detroit is 5-1 in the last 6 meetings between these two teams in St. Louis. The plus money is worth a look considering that the road team has won 11 of the last 14 meetings between the two sides and that Detroit has had a lot of success on the road against the Blues. However, St. Louis is the only team here with something to play for as Detroit has been mathematically eliminated from playoff contention, and every win actually hurts Detroit’s draft positioning. The Blues are looking to pick up steam down the stretch, so I’ll side with St. Louis here and to negate some of the juice, I’ll lay a goal with the Blues here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8060.706

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)→French-language works237,207→