MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028586980

Fentanyl detection and quantification using portable infrared absorption spectroscopy

2021· dissertation· en· W7028586980 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFentanylPartial least squares regressionInfrared spectroscopyAttenuated total reflectionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Absorption (acoustics)Benzodiazepine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Community drug checking is a harm reduction strategy that is currently being employed
\nin response to the ongoing overdose crisis in North America. The Vancouver Island Drug
\nChecking Project uses a variety of methods to analyze drug samples including fentanyl
\nand benzodiazepine immunoassay test strips, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform
\ninfrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
\nA study was designed to examine the combined ability of infrared spectroscopy and partial
\nleast squares regression to quantify the fentanyl content of illicit opioids. Binary and
\nternary mixtures of powdered fentanyl HCl, anhydrous caffeine and sugar alcohols were
\nprepared as standards representative of the opioids samples presented for drug checking.
\nThe infrared spectra of each set of standards was used to train and test individual partial
\nleast squares regression models. A grid search was employed to optimize the number of
\nlatent variables and data pre-processing strategy for each model. A robust partial least
\nsquares regression model, trained on all four sets of standards, was shown to accurately
\nquantify fentanyl content. This model was then used to evaluate the fentanyl concentration
\nof samples brought in for drug checking. In the period October 2018 to December 2020,
\nthe detected level of fentanyl in opioid samples had a mean concentration of 10% with a
\nstandard deviation of 7%.
\nIllicit opioids which contained caffeine hydrate were discovered upon examination of
\nthe anomalous service samples that were identified by local outlier factor. The infrared
\nspectrum of caffeine shows subtle changes upon its hydration, which are due to differences in the hydrogen bonding pattern of the two forms of caffeine. Standards containing semi-hydrated caffeine and fentanyl HCl were prepared and analyzed to explore the effect of caffeine hydration on fentanyl quantification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207