MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028813650

Genetic analysis of the rapid expansion of the Banded Killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) in Illinois

2021· article· en· W7028813650 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIDEALS (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesKillifishEndangered speciesThreatened speciesHouse mousePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent investigations into the rapid expansion of Banded Killifish (Fundulus diaphanus)
\nin Illinois has brought to light significant conservation implications. Previous data suggested
\nthat Illinois should be inhabited by the Western subspecies of Banded Killifish (F. d. menona),
\nthough morphological data from recently encountered populations reveals some populations might be comprised of the Eastern subspecies (F. d. diaphanus) and/or subspecies hybrids. Until
\nnow, the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board has not had to recognize subspecies, and
\nit was possible the recent expansion of Banded Killifish populations throughout Illinois could
\nhave led to the removal of its threatened status, regardless of the subspecies responsible for
\nthe expansion. The goal of our project was to investigate the genetic composition of expanding populations of Banded Killifish across Illinois, with an emphasis on determining whether this recovery of a rare taxa is of the native Western subspecies, an invasion of the non-native Eastern subspecies, or whether hybridization between subspecies is occurring. We compared the molecular characteristics of Banded Killifish populations in Illinois and surrounding areas to those from within the native ranges of the Western Banded Killifish and Eastern Banded Killifish. We collected Banded Killifish between 2017 and 2020 from nearly 100 sites around the Midwest – kettle lakes, southern Lake Michigan basin, the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS), upper Illinois River, lower Rock River, and Mississippi River – as well as areas representing known Western (e.g., Iowa, Minnesota) and Eastern (e.g., Maryland, Canada) subspecies. Genomic material was extracted from muscle tissues via common extraction kits and protocols and included the mitochondrial D-loop and nuclear X-src intron. Our results show that there are three conservation management units within Illinois – 1) the kettle lake region of McHenry and Lake counties, which is the only area not influenced by the non-native Eastern Banded Killifish; 2) the Lake Michigan – CAWS – Illinois River (including Wolf Lake and Powderhorn Lake in Cook County) population that is predominately made up of the Eastern subspecies and hybrids; and 3) the Mississippi River (including lower Rock River) population, which contains both subspecies as well as subspecies hybrids. Our data should provide the resource managers of Illinois a complete understanding of the expansion of Banded Killifish in Illinois and provide a crucial step in conserving the native Western Banded Killifish, while recognizing the existence of a non-native taxa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIDEALS (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)Same topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207