MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028882081

Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci influencing growth, development and morphology in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.)

2003· other· en· W7028882081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusSalmoBackcrossingMorphology (biology)PhenotypeGenetic variationQuantitative geneticsPhenotypic traitTraitAdaptation (eye)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular basis for heritable variation in quantitative traits is poorly understood in most species of fish. This is the case even for salmonids such as the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), one the most intensively studied and economically important aquaculture species. Quantitative genetic studies tell us that traits such as growth, development and morphology are likely to be controlled by a large number of genes, but to date there have only been two loci, the allozyme loci MEP-2* and TRP-2*, which have been shown to consistently influence the salmon phenotype. This thesis sets out to increase understanding of the molecular basis of phenotypic variation in growth performance, development and morphology in the Atlantic salmon. Experiments were performed to look for associations of phenotypic variation with genotypic variation at the molecular level and, thereby, to identify molecular markers linked to regions of the salmon genome containing genes influencing these quantitative traits. This was achieved by analysing phenotypic performance in two F2 backcross families derived from crosses of two outbred wild salmon populations, one from Scotland and one from Canada, which are divergent with respect to growth, development and morphology. The study began with an examination of the relationship between growth prior to first-feeding, utilising endogenous energy supplies, and growth post first-feeding, utilising exogenous energy supplies. The study then focused on growth, development and morphology in individually fish post first-feeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207