MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028921597

Harnessing the Potential of Care Aides in Long-Term Care Settings

2024· article· en· W7028921597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipWorkforceThematic analysisWorkforce developmentHealth careWork (physics)EmpowermentLeadership development
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In Canada, health care aides are the largest frontline workforce in long-term care (LTC) as they provide the majority of direct care to residents. Care aides are central to resident quality of care and quality of life, although their skill sets have lagged behind resident acuity. Training and education programs that focus on developing transformational leadership skills of LTC staff are essential in building a healthier work environment and are often seen as the key to raising standards. Aim: To assess the learning needs of care aides working in a LTC facility with a goal of developing an inclusive leadership training program that fosters transformational leadership behaviours of staff. Methods: Leadership training was offered to care aides between March 2015 and September 2015. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with eleven care aides during the period in which the program was offered to assess changes in their leadership skills. Data were audiotaped, transcribed and a content analysis was performed. Results: Thematic analysis revealed three areas that supported development: ‘reaction’, ‘learning’, and ‘behavioural’ criteria. Participants rated satisfaction with the leadership training program content and material. Care aides also reported improved communication and expressed increased understanding of transformational leadership skills after attending the training program. The program was associated with a positive work environment including extra effort from staff, work effectiveness, and satisfaction with leadership. Conclusion: Given that care aides provide most of the bedside care in LTC, their empowerment and education is key to providing high-quality care to residents. The findings support the implementation of an inclusive leadership approach to improve knowledge and development of transformational leadership skills among LTC staff. Relevance to Practice: The study represents an important step in the evaluation of care aides’ leadership development. In addition to the themes identified by the care aides, previous training and gaps in knowledge identified could inform the design of future training programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicBiomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207