MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7029004491

Home-based prehabilitation for frail cardiac surgery patients (HOME FREE) - a quasi-experimental feasibility study

2024· dissertation· en· W7029004491 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrehabilitationCardiac surgeryPhysical activityBalance (ability)Activities of daily livingHeart rateRandomized controlled trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Frailty is a syndrome characterized by loss of muscle mass, strength, and difficulty completing activities of daily living. It’s presence in patients undergoing major surgical procedure is associated with prolonged postoperative recovery, resulting in functional decline and increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted on pre-frail and frail patients undergoing cardiac surgery at St. Boniface Hospital. Patient’s with an estimated wait time of ≥ 3 weeks for their surgical procedure and who scored ≤ 60 on the short form 36 physical functioning scale were approached to participate in a 100% virtually delivered preoperative home-based exercise intervention. Participants were assessed and prescribed standardized exercises over Zoom and monitored via weekly Zoom conferencing with a physiotherapist (4 sessions over 3 weeks). The program focused on balance and strengthening exercises 3 x/week at a moderate intensity. The primary outcome was the feasibility and practicality of the intervention, defined as a consent rate of ≥ 30% of eligible patients as well as an adherence rate of ≥ 65% to the prescribed exercise program. Secondary outcomes evaluated safety and exploratory efficacy of the home-based program. Results: Among 209 screened patients, only 27 met the eligibility criteria. Nine of the 27 consented to participate, 2 were lost due to early surgical dates and 1 dropped out. Visit data of 6 participants were analyzed and their adherence to exercise was > 75%, with proper exercise technique demonstrated 88% of the time. No safety events occurred and clinically meaningful change in the SPPB score was demonstrated with an effect size of d = -0.99. Gait speed also improved clinically and statistically with a p = 0.026, and effect size of d = -1.57. Conclusion: Feasibility was demonstrated with a consent rate of 33% and an adherence to the exercise protocol of > 75%. Participants safely completed the virtually delivered prehabilitation program and effect sizes were determined to inform future trials. Researchers should test the efficacy of virtually delivered preoperative home-based exercise programming for patients who will undergo cardiac surgery. Eligibility criteria should be expanded to optimize participation in prehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→