Implications Of Population Genetics And Physiological Responses On The Conservation Of Moose (alces Alces Americana)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wildlife populations around the globe are facing numerous, complex challengesto their persistence, yet conservation efforts are hindered by limited information about these populations and the anthropogenic pressures they face. North American moose (Alces alces americana), despite being of ecological, cultural, and economical importance, inhabit remote landscapes, making population monitoring difficult. At the same time, many moose populations, including in Vermont and eastern North America, have experienced recent declines mainly due to winter tick (Dermacentor albipictus) epizootics. Anthropogenic landscape change and climate-mediated pressures pose future challenges for moose across the southern extent of their distribution. Though impacts of winter tick infestation on population vital rates have been well-studied, there has been little research on how moose population genetics and physiological responses interplay with current and future challenges posed by parasites, climate change, and increasing anthropogenic pressures. This dissertation addresses these knowledge gaps by 1) developing a novel approach for estimating wildlife abundance in cases where common abundance measures are difficult to implement, 2) describing the genetic diversity and connectivity of moose populations across the northeastern United States and Southern Quebec, and 3) identifying drivers and fitness implications of stress hormone and nutritional restriction dynamics in Vermont’s highest density moose population. Using a simulated moose population, this dissertation advanced the use of pedigree reconstruction as an abundance estimator, which appeared particularly useful for low-density populations. Genetic samples from moose across five U.S. states and a Canadian province indicated low measures of genetic diversity yet provides evidence of genetic connectivity that will likely be challenged by future climate, habitat, and population conditions. Finally, several climate, habitat, and parasite variables impacted stress metabolite concentrations and nutritional restriction of radio-collared moose calves, both of which related to winter survival probability. This effort supports novel means of monitoring wildlife populations using data that can be acquired non-invasively and illustrates the compounding suite of challenges facing moose in eastern North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".