MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029306132

Investigations of the identity of the true catalyst in three systems, including the development of catalyst poisoning methodology

2007· article· en· W7029306132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPacific Northwest National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimler AkademisiOffice of ScienceSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of WashingtonColorado State UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCatalysisBenzeneX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCyclohexeneTransmission electron microscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Nanoparticle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following brief reviews of the pertinent "who is the catalyst?"and "M 4 (M= transition-metal) cluster catalysis" literature, the research presented herein is focused on the investigations of the true catalyst for three different catalytic systems.The studies include: (i) the investigation of the true catalyst for neat benzene hydrogenation beginning with commercially available [Ir(cod)Cl] 2 (cod= 1,5-cyclooctadiene) at 22 C and 40 psig initial H 2 pressure; (ii) the investigation of the true catalyst for benzene hydrogenation beginning with commercially available [RhCp*Cl 2 ] 2 (Cp*= pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) at 100 C and 50 atm (740 psig) initial H 2 pressure; and(iii) the investigation of the true catalyst for cyclohexene hydrogenation beginning with the wellcharacterized, site isolated [Ir(C 2 H 4 ) 2 ]/zeolite-Y complex at 22 C and 40 psig initial H 2 pressure, studies done collaboratively with Professor Bruce C. Gates and his group at the University of California-Davis.All three investigations aimed at identifying the true catalyst were studied via an arsenal of complimentary techniques including kinetics, in operando and post-catalysis X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy, kinetic quantitative poisoning experiments, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and high-angle annular dark-field scanning electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM).The data obtained for each system iii presented herein provide compelling evidence that the proposed species in each chapter are the true catalyst of the given system, specifically (and respectively) for (i), (ii), and (iii) above Ir(0) n nanoparticles and aggregates, Rh 4 sub-nanometer clusters, and atomically dispersed, mononuclear Ir 1 /zeolite Y catalysts.The results emphasize the need to use complimentary, multiple methods in order to correctly identify the true catalyst in such catalytic systems.The final study elucidates kinetic quantitative catalyst poisoning via two model catalysts: Rh(0) n nanoparticles and Rh 4 clusters, providing detailed analyses of linear as well as non-linear kinetic quantitative poisoning plots.The resulting quantitative kinetic catalyst poisoning studies of Rh(0) n nanoparticles and Rh 4 clusters led to estimates of the equivalents of poison bound, quantitative catalyst poisoning association constants, and the numbers of active sites for each catalyst.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it